Yea that'd be why there's the rule #3 mandate. A slander claim must have all 3 components. And mandate #3 is the "was it believed" filter. There isn't going to be any kind of computable financial...
Type: Posts; User: katajojo; Keyword(s):
Yea that'd be why there's the rule #3 mandate. A slander claim must have all 3 components. And mandate #3 is the "was it believed" filter. There isn't going to be any kind of computable financial...
Yes, do you?
There's nothing "opinionated," nor funny, nor "just an exaggeration," about what this coworker is doing. She's not stating an opinion, she's not trying to be funny, nor have some...
Actually is IS slander IF it fits these THREE things.
1. It is false
2. It is done with malicious intent, or is considered vile enough by normal standards that malicious intent can be implied.
3....