Search:

Type: Posts; User: trackm0nster; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Lights, Signs and Traffic Controls: Re: CVC 22450 (A) Failure to Stop - Brief Stop, Bottom of Hill

    And I completely agree with you and L-1 regarding how the car is supposed to act on a stop. This is the unspoken rule to stopping, so to speak, but again, this is vaguely (if even) expressed in the...
  2. Lights, Signs and Traffic Controls: Re: CVC 22450 (A) Failure to Stop - Brief Stop, Bottom of Hill

    I understand your point regarding stopping, and I do agree with it. However what I am saying is that "stopping" is not clearly defined in the vehicle code. It is not expressed that "In order to have...
  3. Lights, Signs and Traffic Controls: Re: CVC 22450 (A) Failure to Stop - Brief Stop, Bottom of Hill

    @ L-1

    Thanks for the help. I agree with your definition of stopping, but my argument is that this is not clearly defined in vehicle code. As long as I ceased movement of my vehicle during the...
  4. Lights, Signs and Traffic Controls: Ticket for Failure to Stop at the Bottom of a Hill Despite Stopping Briefly, VC 22450

    My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: California

    So I was cited for violating CVC 22450 (a), and am seeking advice on the angle that I am contesting the ticket.

    To begin,...
  5. Speeding Tickets: Re: 82 in 65 - Result from Tailgating

    Just out of curiosity, since it sounds like there is no other way I can fight this ticket, what would an effective argument be to fight violating 22349 (a)?

    For those who think I am fighting it...
  6. Speeding Tickets: Re: 82 in 65 - Result from Tailgating

    What's done is done. I cannot go back in time and change my reaction to this situation. I don't believe i am 100% at fault, as I would have never sped up if I wasn't tailgated. My insurance is high...
  7. Speeding Tickets: Re: 82 in 65 - Result from Tailgating

    10:30 PM with HID Lighting alongside high beams ? It was quite intimidating to say the least. I also want to add that the normal flow of traffic is about 80+ on any given day.

    I meant, that the...
  8. Speeding Tickets: Re: 82 in 65 - Result from Tailgating

    Thanks!

    But the 82 is Prima Facie unlawful, and the increase of speed was necessary for safety and did not violate the basic speed law...
    so I don't know how the minimum speed law would interact...
  9. Speeding Tickets: Speeding Ticket that Resulted from Tailgating

    My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: California

    Charged with 22349 (a) for allegedly going 82 in 65

    I was going home from dinner with my girlfriend on July 29th 2011.
    ...
Results 1 to 9 of 9