I think were on the right track now. It would be a series of servient and dominant owners to make up the ROW. So either party would have a right to maintain or improve the series of easements. As the...
Type: Posts; User: Desertdog; Keyword(s):
I think were on the right track now. It would be a series of servient and dominant owners to make up the ROW. So either party would have a right to maintain or improve the series of easements. As the...
I may have have had it backwards. The developer would be the easement holder (dominant) the easement owners (servient) property the developer needs to improve. So are you saying only the servient...
I looked at it as a private party having a right to improve someone else's property without their permission which doesn't seem correct. Being an easement that they have a vested right in puts it in...
My question involves real estate located in the State of: AZ
We have a situation where a developer building homes needs to upgrade the private easements for his ingress/egress to meet County...
Are you stating that non property owners, basically everyone else in the area or vicinity that owns other parcel outside of our subdivision is considered a servient estate ( like the property owners)...
My question involves real estate located in the State of: Arizona
I live in a rural subdivision. There were easements established when the property was subdivided. All of our roads are easements....
I would agree with you if the funds for the down payment on the 2nd house didn't come from the home equity/line of credit of the 1st house. If the money came from another source non-issue but it...
My question involves a foreclosure in the State of: Nevada
This should infuriate most people who try to live within their means ........
I work with a few people that have used their house...