The response you received from Caltrans is as legally accurate as can be. But even if the road was posted with a speed limit that required a survey, the officer cited you for a code section that...
Type: Posts; User: That Guy; Keyword(s):
The response you received from Caltrans is as legally accurate as can be. But even if the road was posted with a speed limit that required a survey, the officer cited you for a code section that...
Sorry I did not see ^this^ until yesterday...
I think it was before your arriving on the scene, TMN, but Quirky and I had this same discussion back then... And aside from the details of that...
Did you have a question?
And please include the code section you were cited for.
So you believe it was an improper turn and you know the officer witnessed it and cited you for it.What good...
Typical waste of time post from Searcher... There is absolutely NOTHING that can be gained by pleading not guilty!
The two hour drive alone -each way- is four hours you could study... Or pick your...
No, actually, I read it in its entirety.
It does? Can you point me to the part where you mentioned karaoke in ANY of your posts... Thanks!
Oh... And the part where you said something about...
You know big rigs... Tractor trailers... Whatever you want to call them are much larger than your Kia Sorento... And therefore mother nature imposes a higher downhill momentum than you could ever...
Actually, its not a big loophole for the state, instead, it simply establishes the MUTCD as a design/traffic engineering standard developed by the federal government as a way to provide for a uniform...
You know, I did not even notice... Had I noticed, I would normally ask that you start your own thread, particularly to avoid confusion -between answers given to you for your situation and those given...
Here is the code section
CVC 21453
(a) A driver facing a steady circular red signal alone shall stop at a marked limit line, but if none, before entering the crosswalk on the near side of...
The turning lane on the segment of Las Tunas Drive is not an opening, per se, as it would be defined under 21651 simply because you can enter and turn left -into a driveway for example-... So...
Aaahh, yes, there is it... The disappearing code section #.
Thank you. I was actually wondering if the OP had been cited for CVC 21970 blocking the crosswalk or similar... But its not. Which makes...
What code section was he cited for?
What code section did he cite you for?
PS: Congratulations!
Limit is 65 and my best bet is everyone was going 70 max. CHiPper had his emergency light on the entire time. So I doubt anyone in their right mind would do 80. There were several opportunities where...
Long post so brace yourself... Let me start with this part:
Very surprised why? Because your speedometer is broken? And by the way, over 25 is not reckless, however, the way you were splitting...
Sounds like its a valid citation, doesn't it?
And there is no requirement to have a no turn on red sign. When the signal for your intended movement shows red, you must stop as required. THEN if...
Well, naturally, she tried to pass since you do say you slowed down. But one can safely assume that she would not have attempted a pass if you had signaled before you slowed down.
So to assume...
I am not sure who your comment was directed towards... But I'll give it my best shot. First let me qualify my remarks by saying that my knowledge of Washington law is fairly limited, but I am certain...
So is this to mean that you were cited by a speed camera in the City of Cleveland, Ohio?
Which courts are you talking about? And ruled against the use of traffic cameras for which cities in...
Well, then it is I who has to apologize, not you. I should have read "more of" your reply instead of reading "into it"... Typically, the circumstances under which you were cited, an argument with the...
You were to get arraigned. You were not arraigned. And as such, it leaves you with nothing to complain about since the 45 day time restriction has not begun yet and will not begin until 8/11/2014....
Your only op[tionm at this poiint is to request a trial de novo. The outcome of your TBD which resulted in a conviction makes the $100 base fine a mandatory fine by way of CVC 42001.15
CVC...
So are we supposed to guess if you wen straight or turned right?
And which St. Louis, Mo ordinance or municipal code section were you cited for?
You mean to say you don't know? You came here claiming to be innocent and yet you are just barely trying to figure out if you understand the law correctly or not?
Yes, you would be right, but that...
Don't roll your eyes too far back....
Funny how you mention "biases".... Actually, lets evaluate biases here... Yours first:
/
In addition, you have $238 + the possible cost of traffic...