ExpertLaw.com Forums

You Had Me at Restraining Order

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst Previous 1 2
  • 10-16-2009, 05:01 PM
    Joshuadeuce1
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    I know retaliation is coming.:D
  • 10-16-2009, 05:03 PM
    blueeagle
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Just look at BE, in school he was doing the teacher, at 30, he has a geriatric. His attraction to "Mommy" is probably not one of choice.
    First, I'm 29! Get it right! Second, I would rather be attracted to a 40 year old woman than date a 14 year old like you, jeff, and jk!
  • 10-16-2009, 05:22 PM
    jk
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting blueeagle
    View Post
    First, I'm 29! Get it right! Second, I would rather be attracted to a 40 year old woman than date a 14 year old like you, jeff, and jk!

    If the wife was no more than 3 times that age, I would be thrilled. If she was only twice that age, I would probably be dead. I would be smiling but probably dead.
  • 10-16-2009, 05:31 PM
    Joshuadeuce1
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    My point was orientation is probably not by choice. Some people are attracted to boys, some to girls, some to hardbodies, and some to......WRINKLES.

    BE, I do not get angry, I get even.:D I owed you one for a homo joke about me and Ashman. Score settled.:D
  • 10-16-2009, 05:34 PM
    blueeagle
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    My girlfriend is 41, but shes hot! You would be dead in a nano second! Hmmm... I wonder if she would be willing to "help you out". Ah well, it ain't like she has anything to worry about about. Ashman says you can't "get it up". :p
  • 10-16-2009, 05:36 PM
    cyjeff
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting blueeagle
    View Post
    My girlfriend is 41, but shes hot! You would be dead in a nano second! Hmmm... I wonder if she would be willing to "help you out". Ah well, it ain't like she has anything to worry about about. Ashman says you can't "get it up". :p

    The good news is that you both found someone that is better than you deserve.

    The perfect relationship.
  • 10-16-2009, 05:41 PM
    blueeagle
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting cyjeff
    View Post
    The good news is that you both found someone that is better than you deserve.

    The perfect relationship.

    I don't get it. Are ya sayin Im better than her, or are you sayin' shes better than me? I aint knowin.
  • 10-16-2009, 05:43 PM
    cyjeff
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting blueeagle
    View Post
    I don't get it. Are ya sayin Im better than her, or are you sayin' shes better than me? I aint knowin.

    That is exactly what I am saying.

    You have youth and... youth.

    She has poor eyesight and the ability to lower her standards as the situation allows.

    The perfect relationship. Enjoy your cougar.
  • 10-16-2009, 05:47 PM
    blueeagle
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting cyjeff
    View Post
    That is exactly what I am saying.

    You have youth and... youth.

    You forgot charm, good lunks, intelligence, and a great sense of humor! :p
    Quote:

    She has poor eyesight and the ability to lower her standards as the situation allows.
    She actually has 20/20 vision.
    Quote:

    Enjoy your cougar.
    I shall. ;)
  • 10-16-2009, 06:10 PM
    jk
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting blueeagle
    View Post
    My girlfriend is 41, but shes hot! You would be dead in a nano second! Hmmm... I wonder if she would be willing to "help you out". Ah well, it ain't like she has anything to worry about about. Ashman says you can't "get it up". :p

    trust me, with my medicine, she would not be wanting, she would be getting and for much longer than she ever thought possible.
  • 10-16-2009, 06:13 PM
    blueeagle
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting jk
    View Post
    trust me, with my medicine, she would not be wanting, she would be getting and for much longer than she ever thought possible.

    doubt she would want you wrinkled and unwashed body any where close to hers. :p
  • 10-16-2009, 06:22 PM
    jk
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting blueeagle
    View Post
    doubt she would want you wrinkled and unwashed body any where close to hers. :p

    Wrinkled? Not once I take my medicine. The only important thing definitely is not wrinkled after that. Extremely taught would be more correct.
  • 10-16-2009, 06:34 PM
    Joshuadeuce1
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Damn, I should have taken the over on this one.
  • 10-16-2009, 07:49 PM
    ashman165
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting 2ecaauhsoj
    View Post
    Damn, I should have taken the over on this one.

    Mendacity, while not an unusual word, means deception. And JK is right: the words meant exactly what they said.

    And they means they; he said they; he meant all "mos". No amount of lying on his part changes that.
  • 10-16-2009, 08:06 PM
    blueeagle
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting 2ecaauhsoj
    View Post
    Damn, I should have taken the over on this one.

    What in the hell are you talking about?
  • 10-16-2009, 08:09 PM
    jk
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting ashman165
    View Post
    Mendacity, while not an unusual word, means deception. And JK is right: the words meant exactly what they said.

    And they means they; he said they; he meant all "mos". No amount of lying on his part changes that.

    Lying? If anybody is lying, it's you.

    here is what I posted:

    Quote:

    Mos are disgusting and if they left the world, regardless of how it came about, I would not have a problem with it.
    Nowhere does that state nor imply that I would have a hand in the mos leaving this earth. Nowhere in there does it imply that I want all the mos to be savagely killed by disembowelment with intestines being drawn out as it was wound up on a roller rotated by a crank all the while being alive so they are able to watch their own intestines being taken from their body or even the somewhat appropriate "Pear of Anguish"

    I simply said it wouldn't bother me if they all left the world. Trying to pervert (yes, you are still at it) my statements make them your statements.

    Quote:

    Quoting blueeagle
    View Post
    What in the hell are you talking about?

    the bet about this thread exceeding 4 pages or not.
  • 10-16-2009, 08:22 PM
    Joshuadeuce1
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    $20 down the drain, checks in the mail. Double or nothing on eight pages?
  • 10-16-2009, 08:36 PM
    blueeagle
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    JK, were you an english major? Seriously?
  • 10-16-2009, 08:38 PM
    jk
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting blueeagle
    View Post
    JK, were you an english major? Seriously?


    what's the joke?

    Quote:

    Quoting 2ecaauhsoj
    View Post
    $20 down the drain, checks in the mail. Double or nothing on eight pages?

    you have to realize; if you bet with anybody posting, they can run the thread as far as they want, unless Aaron shuts it down.

    There is your sure thing. Offer to split winnings with Aaron and he might close the thread at such a time you would win.
  • 10-17-2009, 11:18 AM
    Joshuadeuce1
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Thought sure vulgarity would close this one. Shhh, I'm pm'ing Aaron right now to strike a deal.:D
  • 10-17-2009, 01:38 PM
    blueeagle
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting jk
    View Post
    what's the joke?


    No joke. Im actually serious
  • 10-17-2009, 02:04 PM
    ashman165
    Re: You Had Me at Restraining Order
    Quote:

    Quoting jk
    View Post
    Lying? If anybody is lying, it's you.

    here is what I posted:



    Nowhere does that state nor imply that I would have a hand in the mos leaving this earth. Nowhere in there does it imply that I want all the mos to be savagely killed by disembowelment with intestines being drawn out as it was wound up on a roller rotated by a crank all the while being alive so they are able to watch their own intestines being taken from their body or even the somewhat appropriate "Pear of Anguish"

    No, the problem with the statement is that it's inclusive of any method of our leaving available: including your furtively imagined being savagely killed by disembowelment. The problem with it, and you should know this, is that it provides a warrant for any sort of action; it has nothing which is out of bounds. I'm sorry that you're pretending to be too stupid to understand that. Or are you even pretending anymore? After all, haven't you a warrant to convert people to accepting your imaginary friend? How reasonable can you actually be?

    Quote:

    Quoting blueeagle
    View Post
    JK, were you an english major? Seriously?

    No, he was clearly not. His inability to use the singular possessive case with any degree of accuracy easily solves the question.
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst Previous 1 2
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:34 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2004 - 2018 ExpertLaw.com, All Rights Reserved