ExpertLaw.com Forums

A query on possession laws.

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst Previous 1 2 3 4 ... Next LastLast
  • 10-05-2007, 02:24 PM
    deadlock
    Re: A query on possession laws.
    My bet is about four hours.
  • 10-05-2007, 02:38 PM
    seniorjudge
    Re: A query on possession laws.
    Daniel, I'll answer your question.

    It's a legal urban legend. In other words, it doesn't mean squat.

    Another one I hear: "You have to live with someone for seven years before a common law marriage is valid."

    Google possession nine tenths law for tons of info.

    Now, go read stuff by Bryan Garner.

    http://www.lawprose.org/

    He is a plain language advocate and you really need to learn from him.
  • 10-05-2007, 05:07 PM
    danielpalos
    Re: A query on possession laws.
    Quote:

    Quoting cbg
    View Post
    Tell you what, Daniel.

    When I see some evidence that you're willing to stay on topic on other people's threads, I'll stay on topic on yours.

    So far, I've yet to see any such evidence.

    You are more than welcome to refrain from baiting with extenuating logic and reason circumstances, and I will try to stay on topic better.
  • 10-05-2007, 05:09 PM
    danielpalos
    Re: A query on free speech in the Banter forum.
    Quote:

    Quoting aaron
    View Post
    If you want to start your own forum somewhere, nobody's stopping you. (Free hosting!)

    Thanks for the link.

    I originally stopped by on this forum because I had questions based on legal doctrines that I wanted to find out more about.
  • 10-05-2007, 05:17 PM
    danielpalos
    Re: A query on possession laws.
    Quote:

    Quoting seniorjudge
    View Post
    Daniel, I'll answer your question.

    It's a legal urban legend. In other words, it doesn't mean squat.

    Another one I hear: "You have to live with someone for seven years before a common law marriage is valid."

    Google possession nine tenths law for tons of info.

    Now, go read stuff by Bryan Garner.

    http://www.lawprose.org/

    He is a plain language advocate and you really need to learn from him.

    Thanks for the link.

    Doesn't the common law marriage thing depend on the state?

    What about possession laws, and the Ninth Amendment.

    If there are no domestic tranquility of the state issues, when does the traditional police power of the state have the authority to deny and disparage that right and power?
  • 10-05-2007, 05:36 PM
    deadlock
    Re: A query on possession laws.
    Quote Daniel-
    Quote:

    Doesn't the common law marriage thing depend on the state?
    Thing? What thing do you mean "thing"?

    Quote:

    What about possession laws, and the Ninth Amendment.
    What about them? Do you know anything about the concept of "possession" in legal terms?

    Quote:

    If there are no domestic tranquility of the state issues, when does the traditional police power of the state have the authority to deny and disparage that right and power?
    What's your question? What is it that you are asking here? Break it down. If there is no domestic tranquility? What type of situation are you talking about? Give an example of where there was or is no domestic tranquility.
  • 10-05-2007, 06:14 PM
    danielpalos
    Re: A query on possession laws.
    The common law marriage issue is a state prerogative, from my understanding.

    If I had perfect knowledge of the legalities of possession, I would not be asking about them.

    I don't question the traditional police power of the state in matters pertaining to the domestic tranquility of that state.

    My question arises, when there is sufficient domestic tranquility, and someone is in possession of a Thing; and, the state (via legislation, from politics) has some concerns over which Things those citizens may possess.
  • 10-05-2007, 06:20 PM
    seniorjudge
    Re: A query on possession laws.
    Quote:

    Quoting danielpalos
    View Post
    The common law marriage issue is a state prerogative, from my understanding.

    If I had perfect knowledge of the legalities of possession, I would not be asking about them.

    I don't question the traditional police power of the state in matters pertaining to the domestic tranquility of that state.

    My question arises, when there is sufficient domestic tranquility, and someone is in possession of a Thing; and, the state (via legislation, from politics) has some concerns over which Things those citizens may possess.

    Tautologies and gobbledygook.

    Ask a question a fifth grader can understand.
  • 10-05-2007, 07:03 PM
    deadlock
    Re: A query on possession laws.
    Quote:

    Quoting danielpalos
    View Post
    The common law marriage issue is a state prerogative, from my understanding.

    If I had perfect knowledge of the legalities of possession, I would not be asking about them.

    I don't question the traditional police power of the state in matters pertaining to the domestic tranquility of that state.

    My question arises, when there is sufficient domestic tranquility, and someone is in possession of a Thing; and, the state (via legislation, from politics) has some concerns over which Things those citizens may possess.

    I am under the assumption that there is now and has been some type of connection thing between the state and police. Therefore, it must stand as logical deduction that if there is substantial domestic tranquility within the common law of doctrine, the police power is adequate and lawfully called upon to settle a domestic dispute.

    In the event that the state is in possession of the Ninth Amendment the state may call an emergency use of state police to quell the state of unequal tranquility within the common law marriage.

    Although there remains outstanding, in this issue of possession, the doctrine which allows for the possession of the domestic partner given that the common law marriage is so condoned by the state. As long as there is no threat or situation where there is no domestic tranquility there should not be the need for the use of police power in nine tenths of the situations where this has been called.

    It would not then be disputed that there is no denial or disparage of the 9A and right to hold power as long as there is no interference with that same person’s want for power.
  • 10-05-2007, 07:04 PM
    deadlock
    Re: A query on possession laws.
    Quote:

    Quoting seniorjudge
    View Post
    Tautologies and gobbledygook.

    Ask a question a fifth grader can understand.

    Your Honor,

    Absolutely! ;)
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst Previous 1 2 3 4 ... Next LastLast
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2004 - 2018 ExpertLaw.com, All Rights Reserved