Quoting
flyingron
The fact you didn't avail yourself of what was available doesn't mean you didn't have it.
Why do you think you need to do this. Even if you had a cause a "not for profit venture" is neither required, nor does it fulfill the needs to have a class action. It's harder to form a class action than it is for your individual suit. There's a bunch of things you need to have to have a class action that you don't have:
1. You have to have an ascertainable class. You can't just say "I'm suing on behalf of all the downtrodden people in my situation." You have identify a specific group of people.
2. You have to show that there are so many people in that class that you can't just sue on their individual behalfs. For instance, if something bad happens that affects me and my five neighbors, we'd have to join together for an action listing each of us rather than using a class action
3. You have to show commonality. It's not enough that the "system" has harmed all these people. You'd have to show that the specific person you're suing (this particular police departement or whatever) is common toa ll of them.
4. You have to show typicality. That is that all the actions, had they been brought invidually, have the same issues involved and the same prosecutions or defenses (i.e., cookie cutters of each other).
5. You have to show that YOU as the person bringing the suit adquately represents all the others in the class.
...just to name a few.
Impossible, pro se. You might be able to convince an attorney to take it on a contingent fee basis IF YOU HAD A CASE THAT HE COULD REMOTELY WIN. The problem is your case is so specious, that no attorney would risk his license even filing something so frivolous.
This all ignores the fact that YOU DON'T HAVE A CASE for even your specific case, let alone to support a class action.