What Evidence is Required to Convict for Theft in Absence of Direct Evidence
I went to store to purchase some item.Some stranger was standing next to me at store. Next day when I went to the same store that random stranger is blaming me for pickpocketing his mobile saying I was the only one standing next to him. He doesn�t have any direct evidence nor any eyewitness. My question is what all evidence will be required in absence of direct evidence to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt and to get me convicted. Please list all the evidence required by him to prove theft.
Re: What Proof is Required to Convict in Theft in Absence of Direct Evidence
List all evidence? It doesn’t work that way. Evidence available is based on the specific situation.
Re: What Proof is Required to Convict in Theft in Absence of Direct Evidence
This is all fact the victim has.( I was standing next to him and when I left his phone was missing) I am asking in this situation. I haven’t done it. I am worried how can I be convicted on this or not.
Re: What Proof is Required to Convict in Theft in Absence of Direct Evidence
You aren't in the United States. You will need to speak to a lawyer in the nation in which you're being prosecuted.