ExpertLaw.com Forums

Tampering With Evidence vs. Obstruction of Justice

Printable View

  • 02-28-2017, 11:03 AM
    lawfacts
    Tampering With Evidence vs. Obstruction of Justice
    What is the difference between tampering with evidence and obstruction of justice in Ohio?
  • 02-28-2017, 11:20 AM
    Mr. Knowitall
    Re: Tampering With Evidence vs. Obstruction of Justice
    The short answer is that tampering with evidence is a narrowly defined crime, which in many cases might instead be charged as obstruction of justice, while obstruction of justice is a charge that includes many actions that would not support a "tampering with evidence" charge -- akin to apples vs. fruit, with an apple being a type of fruit, but not all fruit being an apple.

    More specifically,
    Quote:

    Quoting O.R.C. Sec. 2921.12 Tampering with evidence.
    (A) No person, knowing that an official proceeding or investigation is in progress, or is about to be or likely to be instituted, shall do any of the following:

    (1) Alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any record, document, or thing, with purpose to impair its value or availability as evidence in such proceeding or investigation;

    (2) Make, present, or use any record, document, or thing, knowing it to be false and with purpose to mislead a public official who is or may be engaged in such proceeding or investigation, or with purpose to corrupt the outcome of any such proceeding or investigation.

    (B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of tampering with evidence, a felony of the third degree.

    Quote:

    Quoting O.R.C. Sec. 2921.32 Obstructing justice
    (A) No person, with purpose to hinder the discovery, apprehension, prosecution, conviction, or punishment of another for crime or to assist another to benefit from the commission of a crime, and no person, with purpose to hinder the discovery, apprehension, prosecution, adjudication as a delinquent child, or disposition of a child for an act that if committed by an adult would be a crime or to assist a child to benefit from the commission of an act that if committed by an adult would be a crime, shall do any of the following:

    (1) Harbor or conceal the other person or child;

    (2) Provide the other person or child with money, transportation, a weapon, a disguise, or other means of avoiding discovery or apprehension;

    (3) Warn the other person or child of impending discovery or apprehension;

    (4) Destroy or conceal physical evidence of the crime or act, or induce any person to withhold testimony or information or to elude legal process summoning the person to testify or supply evidence;

    (5) Communicate false information to any person;

    (6) Prevent or obstruct any person, by means of force, intimidation, or deception, from performing any act to aid in the discovery, apprehension, or prosecution of the other person or child.

    (B) A person may be prosecuted for, and may be convicted of or adjudicated a delinquent child for committing, a violation of division (A) of this section regardless of whether the person or child aided ultimately is apprehended for, is charged with, is convicted of, pleads guilty to, or is adjudicated a delinquent child for committing the crime or act the person or child aided committed. The crime or act the person or child aided committed shall be used under division (C) of this section in determining the penalty for the violation of division (A) of this section, regardless of whether the person or child aided ultimately is apprehended for, is charged with, is convicted of, pleads guilty to, or is adjudicated a delinquent child for committing the crime or act the person or child aided committed.

    (C)

    (1) Whoever violates this section is guilty of obstructing justice....

    * * *

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:50 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2004 - 2018 ExpertLaw.com, All Rights Reserved