ExpertLaw.com Forums

Is Being Late for Work Considered to be Misconduct

Printable View

  • 06-30-2014, 01:18 PM
    DallasA
    Is Being Late for Work Considered to be Misconduct
    My question involves unemployment benefits for the state of: California

    I was told my claim was denied because I was "late to work without permission" which met the legal requirements of section 1256. Which basically states if someone quit voluntarily or was fired for misconduct. My question is, is misconduct which I believe is my behavior, circumstantial to my denial of unemployment? Because I obviously did not quit voluntarily I was fired.

    Please help, thank you(:
  • 06-30-2014, 01:26 PM
    cbg
    Re: Relation of Section 1256 and My Reason of Denial
    Being late to work can be construed as misconduct. Misconduct is a valid reason to deny your unemployment claim.
  • 06-30-2014, 01:56 PM
    chyvan
    Re: Relation of Section 1256 and My Reason of Denial
    Quote:

    Quoting DallasA
    View Post
    I was told my claim was denied because I was "late to work without permission"

    If you need the money, appeal it. Latimes article is that 55% of denials in CA get overturned on appeal. The employer will have to prove that you were late, and that you didn't have permission. Also, one time doing that even if it's true is a stretch for misconduct. If it had said "repeatedly" in at least two times or more, I could buy that because after the first time, you'd have been told, "do that again, and you're out of here," but the first time, it makes me think you had an overzealous adjudicator.

    Submit the appeal with "the determination dated mm/dd/yy is wrong. I want an appeal hearing sceduled," and let the employer prove their case in front of an ALJ.
  • 06-30-2014, 04:59 PM
    cbg
    Re: Relation of Section 1256 and My Reason of Denial
    And your assumption that the OP was only late to work once is based on what?
  • 06-30-2014, 07:46 PM
    chyvan
    Re: Relation of Section 1256 and My Reason of Denial
    Quote:

    Quoting cbg
    View Post
    And your assumption that the OP was only late to work once is based on what?

    It wouldn't matter either way. Here's a much worse sounding story regarding tardieS http://www.city-data.com/forum/unemp...ow-appeal.html

    This person is in CA. He has an excellent chance of winning on appeal. That is just how these things work out there.
  • 06-30-2014, 07:48 PM
    cbg
    Re: Relation of Section 1256 and My Reason of Denial
    That may be. Doesn't change the fact that in general, poor attendance is a valid reason for denial. As with all unemployment claims, facts matter, but since we have none we can only provide general information.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:03 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2004 - 2018 ExpertLaw.com, All Rights Reserved