Where do you get the idea that they have lived with this woman for 6 years? You are making some very huge assumptions based on very little information.
Printable View
Oh, I probably misread 7 months as years. Mea culpa.
You're in a no-win situation if that's all you have.
If you get custody, there's a good chance that the kids will resent you for not letting them stay with Dad during his time of need.
If you don't, then you're not going to be happy with it anyway.
Win/win = Leave it alone. Make it clear that you'll be there to help the kids (and yes him, actually) through their time of grief. Reassure them that they won't have to deal with an upheaval during an already difficult time.
From a purely personal point of view - and yes, I did misread and apologize for that - take what you can from this, k?
It gets convoluted so bear with me.
My girls lost their biological Dad when they were little. They never actually got much of a chance to grieve. Then they lost their mother, too. Mom at the time was married to my husband, and both girls were adults (but only just, for the youngest). The family dynamic was different to be sure. But when she died, it hit them massively and we're still dealing with it (and the eldest is pushing 30). Part of the problem was a sort of compounded grief.
For several years, after Dad (technically StepDad) and I got together, I've been the sounding board. They were so bloody mad at their mother and then (in the eyes of the kids) she left them, too. The resented (and still do, to a degree) her. It's taken us a lot of hard work to get them to the point where they're no longer seething with anger, and to accept that nobody is perfect - least of all parents.
Had they been allowed to grieve properly (and much as I understand there's no wrong or right way to grieve, there is still a process of sorts), things might have been different. We'll never know. I can hardly hold that against their Mom though.
The point I'm trying to make is that there is a parental figure as well as Dad. She'll actually go through her own anticipatory grieving, too. If they can involve the kids as much as possible (and as much as is realistic - the two aren't necessarily the same thing), believe it or not it will be of a huge benefit in the long run. But take them from their primary residence while Dad (and yes, Stepmom) need all the love they can get, and it could result in major problems later on.
You're Mom. Nobody is going to take that away from you. And while your concern is natural and understandable, we're not talking about a custodial parent who is terminally ill and has nobody to help out as needed.
You have admitted that she is the primary caregiver. And you've admitted that her condition is the only reason that you filed. If it were me? I couldn't do it. I couldn't put the kids through that.
And yes, I agree with the others that there's a better-than-decent chance that you'll come out of this worse off and for far longer than you can imagine.
It's your choice though.
For what it's worth the cancer is being kept a secret from the kids. There are other issues I have brought up in my declaration.
We should always punish a parent for not wanting to bring that undue burden upon the children. I'm telling you... if your motion mentions that you're asking for a change in custody because stepmom is dying of cancer, I'd like to be a fly on the wall of both the judge and the mediator once they get hold of you. No one likes punitive filings, especially those who cause further grief upon an already grieving parent.
Granted, you're going to do what you want to do so I'll just answer your question. Not only do you not have a snowball's chance in hell of a custody change, but you should also be happy to know that the notes the judge makes about this motion will be in that case file forever not only to remind the bench officer of this motion, but any other bench officer your case may come in front of in during the entire life of the case.
Wow. Just wow.
Thankfully, this forum does not allow editing after a certain time has passed.
Because this is the most stellar example of vicious "parenting" - and I use the term "parenting" very loosely - I've seen in a long, long time.