Ex Parte Child Support Hearings

Ah heck, I'll give it another shot.

The "child" is no longer a child, legally speaking therefore any prior court orders pertaining to the custody and visitation of said child, are moot. As in, "they don't matter now". As in, "You can't stop one from contacting the other". As in "It's legally none of your business".

If someone owes someone else child support, they can take steps.

If not, they can't.

If you want to prevent Dad from contacting another adult, tough.

If you want to prevent the adult child from contacting Dad, tough.

NONE of the information you've so gladly posted for us suggests that you actually have a dog in the fight. That's probably because you don't. Your part in this has long since been utterly negated.

(How did I do, folks?)


(We're seeing a pattern here, non?)

Done well enough that this thread can now be put to rest.

^5

Quote:

---

Quoting Dogmatique

---

Please put your snark back to bed. It's far too early on a Monday morning.

If you don't appreciate or understand the replies you've received, by all means call a few attorneys and have them answer your questions.

---

If you wanted to verify the information that was posted or had questions concerning the context/contents please ask me and also some should have asked more specific questions to lessen the confusion. Where were the questions on the contents – and where were you confused at?

The only questions that were posed to me were, what is your goal and also which city/state was the case heard? That’s it! Also, I know you don’t ask questions just to annoy the poster but you can ask questions without slamming the poster. In the same gesture, I don’t expect to walk into an attorney’s office for legal advice only to be shot down with sarcasm. It doesn’t take more than one poster to make one point. You don’t need to gang up on the poster – that’s too weird. As for contacting an attorney – I have done my homework and paid it. The attorney who runs the law library at our local University (at the time of the paternity); contacted the county attorney’s office and spoke with an attorney during the time of support/custody issue from the receding end; also, at the time of the custody I had hired an attorney – until the father took off overseas; another attorney was hired at the time of the allegation charges – and during the custody hearings.

Regarding the allegation charges:

The physician was in one district and the child in another district. The county (on where the child resided) had requested the case be transferred over – but in the same flex this same county on where the child resided did not request that hearing on the custody case be heard in their jurisdiction. At the time, I didn’t know who to hire for an attorney.

There were “many” issues at the time of the custody not to mention how I was going to handle them and what type of an attorney I would have needed. NOW, and after everything was straighten out, I back handling the father! And you say – that I’m trying to control the relationship? – did I say, please!
Just so you know, and at the time my son was born, he had some health issues where the rate of infection had spread so bad that the doctor order a full biopsy to find out the reasons – at that time I almost lost my son. I was asked at the time to contact the father by the physician – and so I did. I won’t tell you the reply – although I will let you know that I hung up after I heard the father's reply. If you think that I’m trying to control that relationship – if you could call it that, be my guest! For starters – my uncle ran the D.A’s office in the county that I have residency, his cousin was head of the law division and the new D.A. was a good friend of the family. This had absolutely crushed me and my family.

The reason for the post is to get a better idea of where I stand and to get a few opinions not slams. Thank you for the output and I apologize if you have been frustrated.

- - - Updated - - -

Quote:

---

Quoting aardvarc

---

Done well enough that this thread can now be put to rest.

^5

---

Yes, I agree because the posting has become to argumentative. Thank you

Exactly which part are you not getting?

The part where she can't control what other adults do. Even *if* they used to be under her control and custody.