Don't start getting uppity with the very kind people who've responded so far.
If you don't understand WHY the questions are being asked, then you'll need help somewhere else. Because the question of WHY is actually relevant.
Printable View
if you don't understand an English written question, maybe YOU should go somewhere else.
Because people come here looking for answers.
Lida, we understood the question just fine. Law isn't black and white, and sometimes you have to have answers to other questions before we can give a definitive answer.
Now, if he can answer my question regarding HOW it would be in his child's best interest, we can continue this conversation.
For someone who has been here for such a short period of time, perhaps you shouldn't try to dictate who may and may not post. (that was just a suggestion though.)
If you already have an order in place it will be nearly impossible to find a judge that will allow you to pay "outside of court".
If you want the amount of support to be reduced you will have to go back to court and have the order changed. You will have to show that your circumstances changed significantly and prove why the order should be lowered.
The problem is that when child support is concerned, the courts don't care what the parents want, the court is interested in protecting the right of the CHILD to the support of both parents. The court didn't come looking for you two in order to intervene with a child support order. ONE of you, or because of actions of one of you, opened the can of worms by inviting the courts into your fuzzy family structure. Once that happens, the court isn't going to wash it's hands of protecting the child's interest, unless there are some extreme and very specific circumstances. So, once AGAIN, if you expect any answer than "it isn't going to happen", we need to know the CIRCUMSTANCES under which you plan to argue that what you propose is in the CHILD'S best interest. Not yours, not the other parent, but the CHILD. If you've GOT relevant circumstances, we may be able to assist in crafting your argument to the court. If you don't, we can't. Simple, no?
you are saying that if THE TWO PARTIES COMMONLY agree to dismiss the case and handle It out of the court system, the court say: "oh no I cant"?
are you serious, do you know what are you talking about?
pls tell me you are not serious or you do not know what you are talking about.
dude, the PETITIONER is asking the court to dismiss the case. Do you understand that? The petitioner is petitioning the court to dismiss the case against
the plaintiff.
The reason would be that the two parties have made their own agreement abut child support and the agreement is follow the state guidelines.
Why you make things complicated magique? maybe your name should be compligique LOL!
Actually, I was somewhat surprised at the responses.
Here's why:
Mom is only ever forced to file for child support if she uses certain forms of state aid. There is nothing at all stopping Mom from requesting the case to be closed. It happens fairly frequently actually.
The problem with your posts, lida, is that you came onto somebody else's thread and did nothing but antagonize the other posters. Capisce?
Of course in this thread, there's absolutely nothing stopping Mom from simply returning the child support back to Dad. Unless there's a reason why they'd prefer not to - and I can think of a few reasons, none of them exactly kosher.