ExpertLaw.com Forums

How Likely is It That I Will Be Sued if I Ignore a Shoplifting Civil Recovery Demand

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst Previous 1 2
  • 01-15-2014, 08:05 AM
    cbg
    Re: How Likely is It That I Will Be Sued if I Ignore a Shoplifting Civil Recovery Dem
    And my point is that just about every person who gets caught shoplifting claims that they "forgot" to pay, whether there is a civil demand or not.
  • 01-15-2014, 08:55 AM
    Mr. Knowitall
    Re: How Likely is It That I Will Be Sued if I Ignore a Shoplifting Civil Recovery Dem
    Quote:

    Quoting llworking
    View Post
    Walmart is honestly the classic example. When they have someone dead to rights on shoplifting they ALWAYS call the police. They don't call the police on the questionable cases because if police decline to arrest or cite, or the DA declines to prosecute or the person is found innocent, their ability to collect a civil demand is gone.

    Your views about Walmart having been duly noted, that's not correct. A few years ago Walmart created a corporate policy not to prosecute shoplifters over small thefts. Do you want to guess what happened when shoplifters figured out that they could steal small amounts without any fear of prosecution? If you guess correctly, you will understand that Walmart rescinded that policy for legitimate, loss-prevention reasons, and not as part of some sort of conspiracy to try to collect civil demands.
  • 01-15-2014, 09:30 AM
    llworking
    Re: How Likely is It That I Will Be Sued if I Ignore a Shoplifting Civil Recovery Dem
    Quote:

    Quoting Mr. Knowitall
    View Post
    Your views about Walmart having been duly noted, that's not correct. A few years ago Walmart created a corporate policy not to prosecute shoplifters over small thefts. Do you want to guess what happened when shoplifters figured out that they could steal small amounts without any fear of prosecution? If you guess correctly, you will understand that Walmart rescinded that policy for legitimate, loss-prevention reasons, and not as part of some sort of conspiracy to try to collect civil demands.

    If they rescinded the policy of not prosecuting small amounts then why didn't they call the police on the OP? We are not talking about the same thing.
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst Previous 1 2
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:54 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2004 - 2018 ExpertLaw.com, All Rights Reserved