None of which is proof.
And even less if she's a big mouth who just might be coached into saying something.
Then you'll have Dad look puzzled in court and say, "Oh you're talking about my clove cigarettes!".
Sooo..again, where's your proof?
@LL - I don't see it misleading at all. If anything, it's clear to a ridiculous point. But let's clarify even further.
Everything and anything Mom is able to do, also applies to Daddio.
Can a Child's Legal Father Take Custody
Printable View
-
02-02-2014, 08:30 AMDogmatiqueRe: Ohio Law Due to Paternity Rights of Child
-
02-02-2014, 03:19 PMllworkingRe: Ohio Law Due to Paternity Rights of ChildI agree that everything and anything Mom is able to do also applies to dad.Quote:
Quoting Dogmatique
It was this particular statement:
that I felt was misleading...not intentionally misleading, but misleading nonetheless. It would not be illegal for mom to lock herself and the child in the bedroom so that dad could not take the child with him. It would not be illegal for mom to lock herself and the child in the car so that dad could not take the child with him. It would not be illegal for mom to send the child to spend the night with a relative or friend, and not tell dad which one, so that dad could not take the child with him. It would not be illegal for mom to take the child with her to work (or at least in most cases it wouldn't be) so that dad couldn't take the child with him. Mom has equal rights to the child.Quote:
Once again, you cannot legally stop your husband from taking your mutual child UNLESS something is filed with the court.
I felt that the sentence indicated that if dad said that he was taking the child with him, that mom had no legal right to say no, or to take measures to prevent him from doing so.