If there are facts you chose to leave out, then obviously we're not going to know those facts.
If you beleived the woman was a danger to your child, you should have brought a motion to modify or suspend visitation. As you did not, you can be held in contempt of court. The facts you left out may be important, but based on those you've shared you had no basis for refusing to allow the court-ordered visitation.
No, it's not. At least not on this planet.
And the statement doesn't even make sense. How can she refuse to return a child you won't let them see? And if you comply with the order, you're letting them see the child and the threat is moot.
Do you know what you could have done, had you allowed the court-ordered visitation and had they not returned the child? How many guesses do you need?
