ExpertLaw.com Forums

Likelihood of Charges for Possession of a Sawed Off Shotgun

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst Previous 1 2 3
  • 09-05-2013, 07:28 PM
    renji1337
    Re: Possible Charge
    Even if it shows the people look like there doing bad stuff? I.E like the pictures do since it shows them out in a forest dressed up with guns? (although that's not necessarily bad, since people take hunting pictures etc) but in the pictures the weapons were semi auto(legal as far as I know, like a SKS or knockoff semi auto ak47's), and then the shotgun.
  • 09-05-2013, 07:34 PM
    cdwjava
    Re: Possible Charge
    Quote:

    Quoting renji1337
    View Post
    Even if it shows the people look like there doing bad stuff? I.E like the pictures do since it shows them out in a forest dressed up with guns? (although that's not necessarily bad, since people take hunting pictures etc) but in the pictures the weapons were semi auto(legal as far as I know, like a SKS or knockoff semi auto ak47's), and then the shotgun.

    Arguably, you cannot tell if the weapons are functional or real in a photo, you may not be able to determine with sufficient proof where or when the image was taken, etc.

    Now, if they have testimony from others that you were, indeed, possessing illegal weapons or possessing them in a place you shouldn't have them (i.e. they verify what was in the photo) then you might be in trouble.

    As I said, BY ITSELF, the photo is almost certainly going to be insufficient to establish that a crime was committed.
  • 09-08-2013, 06:01 PM
    renji1337
    Re: Possible Charge
    Quote:

    Quoting cdwjava
    View Post
    Arguably, you cannot tell if the weapons are functional or real in a photo, you may not be able to determine with sufficient proof where or when the image was taken, etc.

    Now, if they have testimony from others that you were, indeed, possessing illegal weapons or possessing them in a place you shouldn't have them (i.e. they verify what was in the photo) then you might be in trouble.

    As I said, BY ITSELF, the photo is almost certainly going to be insufficient to establish that a crime was committed.

    In the photos they are all unloaded, the clips are hooked up with no bullets. they didnt ask me where the pictures were taken they assumed it was the same place, they also assumed they were on the same day and I said they were not on the same day(but even after I said that they just kept saying it was the same day, I just kept saying it was not). The shotgun in one of the pictures was Illegal but we did not know so(my friend and me not the one charged) but I am never in a picture holding the shotgun, I am only the one who has taken the pictures.


    One thing is the guns in the photo, they took all of them when they de-facto arrested us before (or detained, I just know I was cuffed and brought to the station but never actually arrested), they were very lenient on me because well, I told them who owned the guns and everything. I didn't lie to them and I answered every question as best I could.

    - - - Updated - - -

    I just realized something, could they have been interviewing me and my friend a second time to get warrants issued on us?
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst Previous 1 2 3
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:26 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2004 - 2018 ExpertLaw.com, All Rights Reserved