Well done.
You need help.
Printable View
yes, you could go to prison for a very long time and your child will be taken by social services.
social services does not leave children in the care of child rapists, regardless of the gender of the offender
YES. YOU WOULD REALLY GET IN TROUBLE IF THE AUTHORITIES FOUND OUT THAT YOU HAD SEX WITH A CHILD.
How many more times and ways do we need to say it? It doesn't matter a damn which gender is the adult and which is the child. THE ADULT COULD AND WOULD GO TO JAIL!!!
Is that damned clear enough for you??????
for an example of what happens when the woman is the elder of the couple; search out stories about teachers having sex with students. Granted, teachers and students is often considered even worse due to the position of authority of the teacher over the student but as you can see, the courts don't have a lot of problems with incarcerating a female that diddles with a little boy.
that would be one of the many many many such situations. It seems I read about at least one situation at least once a month. I just cannot figure out the attraction: an adult with a child. I don't care what the molester wants to claim, there is a noticeable difference in the maturity between a < 16 yo and a >18 y/o. I just cannot see why anybody would want to mess around with a little kid. It's sick.
Can anyone (including OP) please explain to me why the OP felt the need to reverse the genders in this situation?
Manipulation and the false hope that as a female, she'd not face the same exact incarceration, sex offender registration, and the other accoutrements that go along with having sex with children. But alas....she does.
This situation happened to a cousin of mine a few years ago.
OP, my cousin was the older one (four years older than the male) and she ended up on the sex offender registry.
My cousin cannot live close to a school due to her sex offense even though she has two children.
It was the male's parents that turned her in (which is very common in these situations).
I'm baffled that you're concerned with a last name right now. I'm baffled that you seem to have no idea how serious what you did was. He was 12!
Total proof of how effed up the OP is; she shagged a child and her main concern at this point in time is what last name to use?
She's got more issues than National Geographic in my humble opinion.
Who gave you that line of hooey?! There is effectively no such thing as a case that cannot be reopened unless all charges have been dismissed with prejudice by a judge. That is exceedingly rare.
- - - Updated - - -
Then the adult girl would be guilty of multiple felonies and has the DNA evidence to prove it!
- - - Updated - - -
It is also important to note that it does not even indicate that an ADULT has to have intercourse with a minor ... in theory, even two minors who engage in otherwise consensual intercourse can be charged with - at least - a misdemeanor for PC 261.5 (unlawful intercourse). And, for those who would say it would never be pursued, it does happen.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes. A minimum of one felony, and probably more. If you engaged in relations with him when he was younger than 14, then you can be charged with additional felonies AND be required to register as a sex offender for life. Any plea deal might be to reduce the offenses to felony unlawful intercourse so as to avoid the registration requirement.
OMG that is awesome!!!:D And you gave me the credit! I'm gonna get misty here in a minute or two!
Seriously though, you never heard that one before?