Quote:
Mr. Knowitall;629227]
He may have reviewed the evidence. He almost certainly will have a written description of the pictures at issue in the case. The difficulty here appears to be getting the hard drive (or an image thereof) released to the defense expert for analysis. There are a number of reasons why that can be difficult, not the least of which are chain of custody and concern about whether testing might alter or destroy data. Those issues can be overcome, and perhaps they have already been addressed.
absilutely but it sounds like neither the OP or his attorney have anything. Whether that is true or factual is unknown obviously.
Quote:
If this is the lead investigator, three weeks out from trial, one would expect that the prosecutor would be consulting with him about the case and evidence, and he would be preparing for spending a few days sitting next to the prosecutor at counsel table during the trial. It's possible that the prosecutor is anticipating a plea or an adjournment. Note, a common reason for adjournment is that there is another case (or are other cases) with priority that are scheduled for trial on the same date. The prosecutor may be focusing on preparing for a case involving an incarcerated defendant that is expected to go to trial, rather than focusing on cases with lower priority that are very likely to be adjourned.
. The main issue I was speaking to though is the lawyer was seeking the evidence from the cop and, as stated, the cop claimed he was appropriating it for the OP. Something is really wrong with that entire scenario. The lawyer would not be contacting the cop attempting to gain access to the evidence. He would be filing motions with the court. The cop doesn't control the evidence at this time so claiming the cop stated he would provide the evidence requested is just not happening.