I again write a post on the following.
-Default judgment by plaintiff because no response was received from summons.
-Improper service is defense. They state they served someone that does not exist at house (name or description). Also, as per alternate requirements they are to mail second copy which was address (zip code) wrong.
- Judge seems to be on the fence whether defendant was improperly served.
- plaintiff attorney changes every time we go to court.
-Note defense will prevent them from suing because statue of limitations has expired.
If I provide reasonable doubt that I was properly served is the "burden of proof" with the Plaintiff to show that I was properly served? If a process server shows up, by them saying they served me properly reinforce the fact that I was served properly although the affidavit of service contains defects?
If they determine that service was proper does the judgment get vacated anyway and restrained $$ gets released until hearing date?
What evidence does the plaintiff need to provide to prove the debt? Original agreement, statements, signed reciepts, itemized detail of how they determined debt?????