My question involves a child custody case from the State of: California.
Hello everyone. I just found out that my kids 12,and 10 step mother took them to there bank on three separate occasions and had them empty there accounts that I opened for them. Over $1200.00 between the two of them!
I have been working with the bank since i did explain to the bank when i opened them that if given the chance my ex husband would take there money. In the end the bank opened the wrong kind of accounts.
Since this day i also have looked up my 12 year old daughters my space. turns out that she was allowed to say that she is 16 years old and included a variety of pictures that were not suitable for a 12 year old, along with the pictures there was a cartoon of a stripper, and the word SEXY written all over the cover page along with pictures of stiletto heels!! And her description was all about how she just wants a boy to hold and kiss her!! I later found out that it was her step moms 18 year old daughter that post all of this information for her, that my ex husband knew about this page and might i add that the court has twice said my kids are not allowed to be left alone with her. ( I have now deleted the page)
I have been threw the ringer since this woman has come into there lives, we have a court order already but my ex husband violates it when ever he feels. such as changing there doctor with out my knowledge or consent, repeated bad talk about me, bribing the kids with toys and cloths if they dont come with me for the weekend...The new thing is sending me harassing letters in the mail and having my 12 year old read them first.
I cant afford another attorney, but something needs to be done, I dont want to walk in there and look stupid for making big deals over nothing or punished for waisting the courts time. Do i have grounds to go back? I am hoping that the court will finally see that my ex husband is despritly trying to alienate me from the kids and that his wife flat out should not be left alone with them on the grounds of emotional and passibly physical harm.
Does any one agree or am i just crazy?