| Auto Loans and Repossession Creditor actions following late payment or default on motor vehicle loans. |
 |

02-03-2006, 04:28 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2
|
|
Verbal car loan agreement
In the spring of 2003 a friend loaned me 15,000 dollars for a new car. I agreed to pay atleast 200 or more a month. I have paid more than that and now have paid off 7,500. After a argument with this friend, she has threatend to take me to court. She is saying that she will sue me for every penny and say I havnt paid a dime. Of course in the heat of the moment I told her that she didnt have a leg to stand on with no contract, which was probally stupid of me.
My question is this. It was a verbal agreement and all payments were made in cash. What can she do in court and what are my options in the state of Ohio. Thank you.
|

02-05-2006, 05:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: California
Posts: 32,465
|
|
Swearing Contest
If you both tell the truth, the contract will be enforced pursuant to the agreed terms. If one or both of you lie, the court will have to try to decide what the truth is.
|

02-11-2006, 04:08 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2
|
|
|
How does the court go about telling the truth with so little evidence?
|

02-11-2006, 05:10 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 26,484
|
|
|
It's not always easy. The plaintiff has the burden of proof, for what that's worth, so if the judge doesn't know who to believe the defendant should prevail.
|

02-12-2006, 09:30 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,559
|
|
|
There is also a Statute of Frauds limitation. If the contract was to be for over one year it is not enforceable unless it is in writing. My suggestion would be for a third party you both trust help in putting down exactly how much you owe and how much you are going to pay per month and getting both signatures on the contract. Then you are both protected.
|

02-12-2006, 09:42 AM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 26,484
|
|
|
I don't see the Statute of Frauds as an issue. First, if the contract were void under the Statute of Frauds, the parties would have to be restored to their original position, which would require repaying any balance of the money. Second, even if the Statute of Frauds initially applied, the subsequent partial performance of the contract would likely take the contract outside of the statute.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
 |
Forum Sponsor |
 |
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:24 PM.
Information provided in the forum is not intended to substitute for professional advice, including but not limited to professional legal advice. If you submit a question or comment it is assumed that you are interested in soliciting, receiving or giving general information and not legal advice. Laws vary by state, and the laws described in this forum may be different in your state or may have been changed since the information was posted. The legal help offered in this forum comes from volunteers who may not have any formal legal training or knowledge, and all information should be confirmed with a qualified legal professional. All information is made available on an "as is" basis. You should accept legal advice only from a licensed legal professional with whom you have an attorney-client relationship. Use of this forum is subject to the ExpertLaw terms of use.
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2004 - 2008 ExpertLaw.com, All Rights Reserved