Results 1 to 5 of 5

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3

    Default Security in Residential Apartment Buildings

    In residential apartment building where there is a lock on the door but there is a repeat problem of people loitering at the front door gaining access into the building by following tenants in and entering when tenants open the door to leave can a landlord be liable for crime which occurs because a criminal gained access to the building by this method i.e. can a landlord be held liable for failure to have security guards at the door? What is the cite of cases which dealt with this?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    759

    Default Premises Security Liability

    The laws on this subject vary significantly from state to state, with some states answering with an emphatic "no". So you need to specify the jurisdiction.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Massachusetts

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    759

    Default Inadequate Security Litigation

    Massachusetts does permit litigation over allegations of inadequate security at businesses and rental units. However, the owner of the property will not be held liable without proof that the landowner knew or had reason to know of a threat to the safety of persons lawfully on the premises against which the landowner could have taken reasonable preventive steps. Whether posting a security guard is a reasonable measure, or whether the present security is reasonable in the eyes of the Massachusetts court, is something best determined through consultation with a Massachusetts lawyer who handles inadequate security cases.

    Some examples from the past, as detailed in Luisi v Foodmaster Supermarkets, Inc, 50 Mass App Ct. 575;739 NE2d 702 (2000).
    Quote Quoting Inadequate Security in Massachusetts Cases
    Carey v. New Yorker of Worcester, Inc., 355 Mass. at 452: bar owner held liable for injuries inflicted upon a patron who without warning was shot by another customer whom the bar owner's employees knew to be drunk and a troublemaker but whom they nevertheless took no steps to remove from the premises or any other preventive measures.

    Sharpe v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc., 401 Mass. 788, 792-794, 519 N.E.2d 1341 (1988) - common carrier held liable for wrongful death of passenger who without warning or provocation was stabbed repeatedly by another person, where there was evidence that the bus terminal was in a high crime area and had been the scene of a number of personal injury crimes, and where the presence of an uniformed security guard would have acted as a deterrent to this crime.

    Flood v. Southland Corp., 416 Mass. at 72-73 - where store employee knew that teenagers gathered outside the store were "high" and one of them had a knife, but no particular security precautions were taken, the store was potentially liable in negligence for injuries inflicted upon one of the teenagers when stabbed by the teenager with a knife.

    Fund v. Hotel Lenox of Boston, Inc., 418 Mass. 191, 635 N.E.2d 1189, l93-195 (1994) - where hotel was in a high crime area and was aware of numerous crimes within the hotel and at nearby hotels but failed to take certain measures to protect its guests from criminal acts of third persons, the risk of a violent attack upon one of its guests was within the foreseeable risk of harm resulting from that failure.

    Whittaker v. Saraceno, 418 Mass. at 200 - where a commercial landlord had no knowledge of any attacks on tenants in the common area of its office building, the landlord had no reason to know of any threat to the safety of its tenants that required the landlord to take preventive steps to protect its tenants.

    Griffiths v. Campbell, 425 Mass. 31, 35, 679 N.E.2d 536 (1997) - a residential landlord was not liable for the wrongful death of a Boston police officer who was murdered in a drug raid on one of the apartments leased by the landlord to a tenant where the homicide was not within the foreseeable risk of harm based simply on the plaintiff's assertion that the landlord should have suspected drug activity within that apartment.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Security in residential apartment buildings

    As a security consultant who works on these cases frequently the core issue always revolves whether the criminal act was "foreseeable". That term opens a whole can of worms as how that term is finally defined is crafted through expert witnesses and deposition and finally trial in some cases.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Security Deposits: Security Deposit and State of Apartment Between Roomates
    By TFlame in forum Moving Out
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-29-2009, 05:09 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 06:11 PM
  3. Security Deposits: Security Deposit Return After Subletting Apartment
    By dlipp in forum Moving Out
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-13-2009, 01:55 PM
  4. Security Deposits: How To Get Security Deposit Back When I Move Out Of My California Apartment
    By jamba in forum Moving Out
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-22-2008, 01:17 PM
  5. Quiet Enjoyment: Security in Residential Apartment Buildings
    By Hello in forum Living in the Rental Unit
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-06-2005, 09:27 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 
Forum Sponsor
Car Accident Attorney
Injured in a car accident? Talk to a local accident lawyer for free.


Untitled Document