Bluff? You took the car in for repair. You got a diagnosis and a quote. You negotiated and agreed to a lesser price for the repair to be completed. What additional authorization do you think they need? What do you think the odds are that the court isn't going to award them that as "
quantum meruit" (payment in the amount merited by the work you knew they were doing) even if there are problems with the paper trail?
Or the judge might hold that you haven't proved your case, and simply deny your claim, preventing further relief.
Actually, it doesn't look like the mechanic followed the necessary requirements to perfect
a mechanic's lien, ("The lien shall be deemed to arise at the time a written statement of charges for completed work or services is presented to the registered owner or 15 days after the work or services are completed, whichever occurs first", with a thirty day window for the lien sale) so if it were me I would try to take possession based upon payment for the repair and let the repair shop try to sue me for storage fees. In the alternate, I would at least argue that to recover the car I need pay only the $1,025 "for any storage, safekeeping, or rental of parking space" where no application for an authorization to conduct a lien sale has been filed, leaving them to try to pursue any additional storage fees in court. If they won't release the vehicle on payment as described in the statute, a lawsuit for recovery is authorized. California Civil Code Sec. 3068(d).
Bookmarks