If taking up a position that is not entirely what you agree with makes me an idiot, then I guess I am. Please note that I haven't personally resorted to name calling.
Doesn't it? Look at blueeagles blanket statements. blueeagle wants all of these sites shut down because of what some people might be thinking when viewing them. It's overreacting to a problem that can be minimized in other ways.This has nothing to do with thought police.
It is protecting children.
Protecting them to what end? I agree that they should be protected, but by the arguments I see here, it seems that some people would like to prosecute anyone who dared put any photo of any child on the net. That's sad really, and a bit frightening for our legal system. I'll also direct you to my earlier comments on the need for a better definition of the child porn laws. As it is now, the line in the sand on this issue is more a wave in a general direction than something definitive that can be pointed at and tell people not to cross.






Bookmarks