Retroactive Support and Child Support Fraud

[ohiopaternityfraud]

Ohio's general assembly left the door closed yet open with respect to relief under CR 60 b. I am in a case right now where my ex admitted in court testimony that she knew at the time of birth, her second son was not mine. I have a 1.5 m case entered in tuscarawas county against my ex wife, her parents ( they knew and particiapted ) , the TCCSEA and John Doe. Yet the ODJFS, office of child support washed its hand in an earlier case because they only provide general supervision onlt to the counties support agencies here in Ohio. Yet the ODJFS, office of child support wrote the 875 page child support manual, I think it's much more than general supervision. In an ealier case in 2004, the supreme court of ohio established that a father must pay retroactive support for 18 years. The child and or mother is entitled to use the juvenile court system and the CSEA to establish this before the minor reaches age 23. So if I paid 13 years and she then turns around and gets 18 additional years from another man, wouldn't that constitute fraud?

[seniorjudge]

Q: So if I paid 13 years and she then turns around and gets 18 additional years from another man, wouldn't that constitute fraud?

A: Sounds like it to me. But understand I have not read the law on that in your state.

[aaron]

Such a new support order would not constitute fraud against the original payor. And if it follows from the law, even though the mother says "I already collected 13 years of support from John Smith", it's not fraud against the new guy - it would instead be an absurd result of a poorly considered law, which seemingly should either have an offset for the prior support or provide for reimbursement to John Smith.