Typically a failure to raise the issue of nonpaternity during divorce proceedings results in a final judgment declaring the husband to be the father of the children born during the marriage, with courts applying
res judicata to prevent the issue from being subsequently relitigated.
Florida appears to offer a limited opportunity for the father to claim fraud, up to one year after entry of the divorce judgment:
Quoting Parker v Parker, 950 So. 2d 388 (2007)
|
|
We hold that a wife's false misrepresentation concerning her husband's paternity during a dissolution of marriage proceeding constitutes intrinsic fraud which must be attacked by a rule 1.540(b) motion filed within one year of the final judgment dissolving the marriage. Accordingly, we agree with the Fourth District that the petitioner's attempt to vacate the final judgment dissolving his marriage is time-barred.
|