Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2

    Default Statute of Limitations on a Misdemeanor Charge in California

    I was wondering how long the DA has to file charges against a 273.6 in California. Also, if initial misdeamear charges were dropped, is there a statute of limitations as to when they can be refiled? Can you also provide the CCP number...?

    Thanks,

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    28,441

    Default Re: Statute of Limitations on a Misdemeanor Charge in California

    Quote Quoting California Penal Code § 273.6.
    (a) Any intentional and knowing violation of a protective order, as defined in Section 6218 of the Family Code, or of an order issued pursuant to Section 527.6 or 527.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or Section 15657.03 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail for not more
    than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.
    The statutes relating to criminal misdemeanor charges provide:
    Quote Quoting California Penal Code, Sections 802-803
    802.
    (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), (c), or (d), prosecution for an offense not punishable by death or imprisonment in the state prison shall be commenced within one year after commission of the offense.

    (b) Prosecution for a misdemeanor violation of Section 647.6 or former Section 647a committed with or upon a minor under the age of 14 years shall be commenced within three years after commission of the offense.

    (c) Prosecution of a misdemeanor violation of Section 729 of the Business and Professions Code shall be commenced within two years after commission of the offense.

    (d) Prosecution of a misdemeanor violation of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code shall be commenced as follows:
    (1) With respect to Sections 7028.17, 7068.5, and 7068.7 of the Business and Professions Code, within one year of the commission of the offense.

    (2) With respect to Sections 7027.1, 7028.1, 7028.15, 7118.4, 7118.5, 7118.6, 7126, 7153, 7156, 7157, 7158, 7159.5 (licensee only), 7159.14 (licensee only), 7161, and 7189 of the Business and Professions Code, within two years of the commission of the offense.

    (3) With respect to Sections 7027.3 and 7028.16 of the Business and Professions Code, within three years of the commission of the offense.

    (4) With respect to Sections 7028, 7159.5 (nonlicensee only) and 7159.14 (nonlicensee only), of the Business and Professions Code, within four years of the commission of the offense.
    (e) This section shall become operative on July 1, 2005, only if Senate Bill 30 of the 2003-04 Regular Session is enacted and becomes effective on or before January 1, 2005.
    803.
    (a) Except as provided in this section, a limitation of time prescribed in this chapter is not tolled or extended for any reason.

    (b) No time during which prosecution of the same person for the same conduct is pending in a court of this state is a part of a limitation of time prescribed in this chapter.

    (c) A limitation of time prescribed in this chapter does not commence to run until the discovery of an offense described in this subdivision. This subdivision applies to an offense punishable by imprisonment in the state prison, a material element of which is fraud or breach of a fiduciary obligation, the commission of the crimes of theft or embezzlement upon an elder or dependent adult, or the basis of which is misconduct in office by a public officer, employee, or appointee, including, but not limited to, the following offenses:
    (1) Grand theft of any type, forgery, falsification of public records, or acceptance of a bribe by a public official or a public employee.

    (2) A violation of Section 72, 118, 118a, 132, 134, or 186.10.

    (3) A violation of Section 25540, of any type, or Section 25541 of the Corporations Code.

    (4) A violation of Section 1090 or 27443 of the Government Code.

    (5) Felony welfare fraud or Medi-Cal fraud in violation of Section 11483 or 14107 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.

    (6) Felony insurance fraud in violation of Section 548 or 550 of this code or former Section 1871.1, or Section 1871.4, of the Insurance Code.

    (7) A violation of Section 580, 581, 582, 583, or 584 of the Business and Professions Code.

    (8) A violation of Section 22430 of the Business and Professions Code.

    (9) A violation of Section 10690 of the Health and Safety Code.

    (10) A violation of Section 529a.

    (11) A violation of subdivision (d) or (e) of Section 368.
    (d) If the defendant is out of the state when or after the offense is committed, the prosecution may be commenced as provided in Section 804 within the limitations of time prescribed by this chapter, and no time up to a maximum of three years during which the defendant is not within the state shall be a part of those limitations.

    (e) A limitation of time prescribed in this chapter does not commence to run until the offense has been discovered, or could have reasonably been discovered, with regard to offenses under Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code, under Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 25100) of, Chapter 6.7 (commencing with Section 25280) of, or Chapter 6.8 (commencing with Section 25300) of, Division 20 of, or Part 4 (commencing with Section 41500) of Division 26 of, the Health and Safety Code, or under Section 386, or offenses under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2 of, Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 2 of, Section 6126 of, Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 7301) of Division 3 of, or Chapter 19.5 (commencing with Section 22440) of Division 8 of, the Business and Professions Code.

    (f)
    (1) Notwithstanding any other limitation of time described in this chapter, a criminal complaint may be filed within one year of the date of a report to a California law enforcement agency by a person of any age alleging that he or she, while under the age of 18 years, was the victim of a crime described in Section 261, 286, 288, 288a, 288.5, or 289, or Section 289.5, as enacted by Chapter 293 of the Statutes of 1991 relating to penetration by an unknown object.

    (2) This subdivision applies only if all of the following occur:

    (A) The limitation period specified in Section 800, 801, or 801.1, whichever is later, has expired.

    (B) The crime involved substantial sexual conduct, as described in subdivision (b) of Section 1203.066, excluding masturbation that is not mutual.

    (C) There is independent evidence that corroborates the victim's allegation. If the victim was 21 years of age or older at the time of the report, the independent evidence shall clearly and convincingly corroborate the victim's allegation.
    (3) No evidence may be used to corroborate the victim's allegation that otherwise would be inadmissible during trial. Independent evidence does not include the opinions of mental health professionals.

    (4)
    (A) In a criminal investigation involving any of the crimes listed in paragraph (1) committed against a child, when the applicable limitations period has not expired, that period shall be tolled from the time a party initiates litigation challenging a grand jury subpoena until the end of the litigation, including any associated writ or appellate proceeding, or until the final disclosure of evidence to the investigating or prosecuting agency, if that disclosure is ordered pursuant to the subpoena after the litigation.

    (B) Nothing in this subdivision affects the definition or applicability of any evidentiary privilege.

    (C) This subdivision shall not apply where a court finds that the grand jury subpoena was issued or caused to be issued in bad faith.
    (g)
    (1) Notwithstanding any other limitation of time described in this chapter, a criminal complaint may be filed within one year of the date on which the identity of the suspect is conclusively established by DNA testing, if both of the following conditions are met:
    (A) The crime is one that is described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 290.

    (B) The offense was committed prior to January 1, 2001, and biological evidence collected in connection with the offense is analyzed for DNA type no later than January 1, 2004, or the offense was committed on or after January 1, 2001, and biological evidence collected in connection with the offense is analyzed for DNA type no later than two years from the date of the offense.
    (2) For purposes of this section, "DNA" means deoxyribonucleic acid.
    (h) For any crime, the proof of which depends substantially upon evidence that was seized under a warrant, but which is unavailable to the prosecuting authority under the procedures described in People v. Superior Court (Laff) (2001) 25 Cal.4th 703, People v. Superior Court (Bauman & Rose) (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1757, or subdivision (c) of Section 1524, relating to claims of evidentiary privilege or attorney work product, the limitation of time prescribed in this chapter shall be tolled from the time of the seizure until final disclosure of the evidence to the prosecuting authority. Nothing in this section otherwise affects the definition or applicability of any evidentiary privilege or attorney work product.
    Note that the limitations period stops running once charges have been commenced.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: Statute of Limitations on a Misdemeanor Charge in California

    I read through that, but it does not address 273.6 directly. Can you point me to the applicable area? Also, when charges are commenced? Specifically does that mean from the alleged violation? How long after the alleged violation that was never charged? And, lastly, how long can the DA re-file charges that were initially dismissed?

    Thanks,

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    28,441

    Default Re: Statute of Limitations on a Misdemeanor Charge in California

    I will point you as far as the statute. I don't practice law in California.

    Charges are commenced when they are filed. Commence means "to start".

    If charges are dismissed without prejudice, they can be refiled.

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Similar Threads

  1. Retail Fraud / Shoplifting: Shoplifting Statute of Limitations on Misdemeanor
    By pherdzone in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-10-2011, 06:18 PM
  2. Drug Possession: Statute of Limitations On a Consumption Charge in California
    By SaraJ in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-04-2011, 09:01 PM
  3. Arrest Warrants: Statute of Limitations on Misdemeanor Failure to Appear
    By cymbalta in forum Criminal Procedure
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-27-2009, 02:54 PM
  4. Retail Fraud / Shoplifting: Shoplifting Statute of Limitations on Misdemeanor
    By lobogirl in forum Criminal Charges
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-14-2008, 09:30 PM
  5. Initiation of Charges: Statute of Limitations for an Ohio Misdemeanor
    By Elize in forum Criminal Procedure
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-23-2006, 01:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 
Forum Sponsor
Criminal Defense Attorney
Protect your freedom. Consult a criminal defense lawyer for free.




Untitled Document