
Quoting
Taxing Matters
I disagree with some of what has been said here. I think that the fact that some folks disapprove of this sexual relationship is getting in the way of providing objective information. For example, Jack’s wrong that the 20 year-old guy could go to jail for this. In Washington state, the age of consent is 16. Thus, so long as the sex is consensual, he's not committing a crime here. Second, the mere fact that the minor is having sex will not, by itself, result in denial of an emancipation request, particularly when that minor has reached the age of consent and thus the sexual relationship is legal. It would be one factor the court weighs among everything else in making the emancipation decision. If the couple is using birth control and practicing safe sex, I don't see where the idea that the minor is acting so irreponsible as to deny an emancipation request comes from. How does that prevent the minor from being able to care for herself independent of her parents? That is, after all, what the focus of the court’s inquiry is.
Yes, I get that a lot of people object to this kind of relationship. If it were my kid, I’d not be keen on it either. But when looking at legal issues, we have to separate the moral judgment from what the law actually provides. You may think the 20 year old guy ought to go to jail over this, for example, but when the law says it’s not a crime, that’s just not going to happen.
I do agree that the employer might well fire the guy, and maybe the minor too, if it were to learn of relationship. But the law doesn’t require the employer to do that. That would simply be up to the employer to decide.