Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    203

    Default Re: Posting a Negative Online Review of a Business

    Having a good understanding of defamation law is the first thing you need for writing reviews. Opinion is protected. False statements of fact are not. However, the plaintiff has the burden. How would they prove long after the fact the condition of your hair, or anything else. I would not be seriously worried.

    The websites are fully protected under the CDA. The actual posters are not protected there or writing on their own sites. Just ask a few bloggers getting caught up in court in Florida, or Crystal Cox out in Colorado.

    There are practical issues. If you are trashing a financial services company with lots of money and lots to lose from bad press, then you can pretty much expect to get hauled into court. I rather doubt a hair salon or any small business is going to have the resources or want to risk lots of additional publicity over the issue. Most states you can't do defamation in small claims, so it is a major deal to bring a civil action. The business, if a corp. or LLC, is going to have to hire and pay an attorney. Due to tort reform, the winner generally does not get attorney fees awarded in a defamation case, so the jury award (assuming the defendant wins) might well be smaller than the legal fees.

    Lawsuits against ripoffreport are a waste of time and money. They are deadly serious about fighting them and they always win. Then they sue you back for malicious prosecution and they do it often in Arizona where you will be hard pressed to defend yourself. However, lawsuits against posters have been successful.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10

    Cool Re: Posting a Negative Online Review of a Business

    Quote Quoting Conrad Hunter
    View Post
    Having a good understanding of defamation law is the first thing you need for writing reviews. Opinion is protected. False statements of fact are not. However, the plaintiff has the burden. How would they prove long after the fact the condition of your hair, or anything else. I would not be seriously worried.

    The websites are fully protected under the CDA. The actual posters are not protected there or writing on their own sites. Just ask a few bloggers getting caught up in court in Florida, or Crystal Cox out in Colorado.

    There are practical issues. If you are trashing a financial services company with lots of money and lots to lose from bad press, then you can pretty much expect to get hauled into court. I rather doubt a hair salon or any small business is going to have the resources or want to risk lots of additional publicity over the issue. Most states you can't do defamation in small claims, so it is a major deal to bring a civil action. The business, if a corp. or LLC, is going to have to hire and pay an attorney. Due to tort reform, the winner generally does not get attorney fees awarded in a defamation case, so the jury award (assuming the defendant wins) might well be smaller than the legal fees.

    Lawsuits against ripoffreport are a waste of time and money. They are deadly serious about fighting them and they always win. Then they sue you back for malicious prosecution and they do it often in Arizona where you will be hard pressed to defend yourself. However, lawsuits against posters have been successful.
    Thanks for the info. That is pretty much what I thought. I can understand a company getting mad if you intentionally post false information to bring them down. In my case it actually happened so I reviewed them poorly. I give the review I feel they deserve pending their quality of service or product. So I guess RipOffReport could profit a little bit minus court and lawyer fees from counter lawsuits. I often wondered how they could keep that running financially. As an elite computer person, and I am a top coder in 16 different programming languages on multiple platforms, there are not enough hours in a day to run that website by a single person. There would need to be at least a small group to monitor the site let alone the modifications and simple back ups of the user input on some type of media. They get a lot of input on a daily basis. That is unless the owner is a wealthy person and this is a hobby. They are getting a cash flow from someplace.

    Elite Hacker

    1. Sponsored Links
       

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. False Light: Posting Negative Information About Somebody to a Blog
    By cadet305 in forum Defamation, Slander And Libel
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-02-2011, 05:38 AM
  2. Defamation: Someone Posting Comments Online Using My Name
    By AZWriter in forum Defamation, Slander And Libel
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-20-2010, 09:11 AM
  3. Defamation: Can I Be Sued for Posting an Online Review
    By PinkPlumeria in forum Defamation, Slander And Libel
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 09:07 PM
  4. Libel: Accused of Libel Over a Negative Product Review
    By lovelyview in forum Defamation, Slander And Libel
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-12-2009, 08:20 PM
  5. Defamation: Product Complaints and Negative Comments About a Business in Online Forums
    By kismet in forum Defamation, Slander And Libel
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-19-2008, 03:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 
Forum Sponsor
Find A Lawyer - Free, confidential referrals.
Legal Forms - Buy easy-to-use legal forms.




Untitled Document