My question involves court procedures for the state of: hawaii
very happy to find this after hours. So there's no adjudicating at all for me and no trial no instruction for me as well. again, that's 2 years ago. thought everything was dismissed and redirect to another court. But now the other party got the court to grant them attorney n court fees behind my back. so what kind of remedy and defense do I have now? still don't know. oh god---
any smarty to help translate the procedure into plain English? Thank you very much for your help
Case not fully adjudicated on motion. If on motion under this rule judgment is not rendered upon the whole case or for all the relief asked and a trial is necessary, the court at the hearing of the motion, by examining the pleadings and the evidence before it and by interrogating counsel, shall if practicable ascertain what material facts exist without substantial controversy and what material facts are actually and in good faith controverted. It shall thereupon make an order specifying the facts that appear without substantial controversy, including the extent to which the amount of damages or other relief is not in controversy, and directing such further proceedings in the action as are just. Upon the trial of the action the facts so specified shall be deemed established, and the trial shall be conducted accordingly.
P.S. have to start new thread. the old one put a wrong title for me I couldn't change.