Legal Realism

[nicobsm]

@cyjeff
I can garner a few of things about you: you must be a child, 'you are not the boss of me'--what puerile behaviour hence, not an attorney for too you would not make defamatory remarks. Fortunately for you, one cannot sue a child. Certainly, you are single...cheers to you bloody bloke

[cyjeff]

@cyjeff
I can garner a few of things about you: you must be a child, 'you are not the boss of me'--what puerile behaviour hence, not an attorney for too you would not make defamatory remarks. Fortunately for you, one cannot sue a child. Certainly, you are single...cheers to you bloody bloke

Nope... not a child. Not single. Kids of my own... one roughly your age.

I don't do her homework for her either. 'Cause then she wouldn't learn nothin'....

Your obvious attempt to sound erudite and, for some reason, British don't really impress us... or take away from the fact that you are simply a child hoping that someone wouldn't see through your little facade... or else you would have asked for our help on your homework in the first post rather than trying to be coy and deceptive.

One more point... before you correct someone else's speech, I recommend you attempt to achieve something resembling correct grammar. Yours is atrocious.

I truly hope you aren't studying law.... to even suggest you could sue me for ANYTHING I have said here is ... naive.

[Dogmatique]

@cyjeff
I can garner a few of things about you: you must be a child, 'you are not the boss of me'--what puerile behaviour hence, not an attorney for too you would not make defamatory remarks. Fortunately for you, one cannot sue a child. Certainly, you are single...cheers to you bloody bloke

Are you from the UK?

If so - please stop posting. You're truly mortifying the rest of us.

Thanks.

[cyjeff]

Are you from the UK?

If so - please stop posting. You're truly mortifying the rest of us.

Thanks.

Careful... you could get sued, too....LOL.

You know... by that judge that says we have to do her homework or else.....

[Dogmatique]

But I'm ENGLISH! I can't be sued! I'm..I'm..I'm practically ROYALTY!

In fact Katie JUST texted me not three minutes ago warning about imposters trying to take over legal forums.

Weird, that. Totally out of the blue. But that's what happens when you're besties with the bestest.

[cyjeff]

But I'm ENGLISH! I can't be sued! I'm..I'm..I'm practically ROYALTY!

In fact Katie JUST texted me not three minutes ago warning about imposters trying to take over legal forums.

Weird, that. Totally out of the blue. But that's what happens when you're besties with the bestest.

C'mon, can't you throw in a couple of words with extra "U's" or that use "isation" rather than "ization" just to prove it?

[Dogmatique]

I shall colour this sentence with all kinds of fun things, hopefully resulting in the realisation that my behaviour here is nothing other than a specialised form of humour practised by us Brits from time to time.

I beg that nobody will harbour any ill will toward me!

[souperdave]

@cyjeff
I can garner a few of things about you: you must be a child, 'you are not the boss of me'--what puerile behaviour hence, not an attorney for too you would not make defamatory remarks. Fortunately for you, one cannot sue a child. Certainly, you are single...cheers to you bloody bloke

Before ya go on to the advanced levels of education you allude to, ya may want to drop back to some remedial sentence construction and context.

You are not near as smart as you're trying, rather feebly I dare say, to make yourself out to be.

I'd give ya an "A" for the effort(s), but you would rate somewhere in the "D-" range in overall execution.

On second thought, the effort grade should be more like a "B-".............I was being to generous.

[Dogmatique]

So what was that in English, dave?

[souperdave]

So what was that in English, dave?

Simply stated; nice try!

Just realized I effed up also: "......I was being to generous."

OOPS!