My question involves a speeding ticket from the State of: Washington, King County
So now my 3rd son gets a ticket. This is in a known speed trap rolling down a hill in unincorporated King County. He was cited for 54 in a 40. I have seen previous versions of this officer's printed statements and it looks like the officer has dramatically improved his statement. The older statements had big enough holes to drive a truck through. However, I am not quite sure how to attack this one. I have included the discovery materials:
Front of Ticket
The tuning fork and SMD unit numbers line up with the certification that was provided. The officer states that he checked the unit with the tuning forks before and after his shift. Is is a stretch to note that he does not specify which day he before and after his shift he checked the unit? What other ideas do you have on this one?