Unemployment Compensation Tax in California

[danielpalos]

What moral or ethical objections are there to affording a basis in equity to better ensure our privileges and immunities concerning State at-will employment laws, that federal doctrine, and our Ninth Amendment.

In my opinion, simply paying half of the unemployment insurance tax could provide a basis in equity to fully exercise our privileges and immunities under those laws.

CA Labor Code: 2922. An employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.

At-will employment is a doctrine of American law that defines an employment relationship in which either party can break the relationship with no liability, provided there was no express contract for a definite term governing the employment relationship and that the employer does not belong to a collective bargaining group (i.e., has not recognized a union). Under this legal doctrine:

any hiring is presumed to be "at will"; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals "for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all," and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work.[1]

Several exceptions to the doctrine exist, especially if unlawful discrimination is involved regarding the termination of an employee.

As a means of downsizing, such as closing an unprofitable factory, a company may terminate employees en masse. However, there are legal limitations upon the employer's ability to terminate without reason.[2]

Amendment 9
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

[PattyPA]

danielpalos is apparently unaware that there are a few state which DO require the employee pay into the unemployment insurance fund.

Other than that, I'm not feeding the troll on this board, either.

[danielpalos]

I noticed you had no objection to the line of reasoning. Thank you for resting your argument on a non sequitur, which is usually considered a fallacy.

[cbg]

Fallacy:

Always you use that word. I do not think it means, what you think it means.

And that's my last meal for the troll, too. Suggest posting hx.

[danielpalos]

It is also an equivalent to being non responsive.