<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Legal Help - Civil Procedure</title>
		<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/</link>
		<description>The technical side of civil litigation, including starting or answering a lawsuit, subpoenas, and discovery, and small claims court.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:39:45 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Jurisdiction and Venue: Internet Business Jurisdiction</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158828&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:37:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Suppose I own a business selling an information product which consumers purchase online and receive by email.  The product includes opinions about...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Suppose I own a business selling an information product which consumers purchase online and receive by email.  The product includes opinions about people and businesses (&quot;entities&quot;) located in State A. <br />
<br />
I am concerned about SLAPP suits.  If the business is incorporated in State B and I live in State C, can an entity in State A sue me in State C?  <br />
<br />
Thank you.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>AllenM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158828</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Civil Procedure Issues: How Long Does it Take for a Case to Appear on a Court Website Docket</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158610&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:05:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>My question involves business law in the state of: Nevada 
A friend of mine has a business that was sued in Nevada (apparently). I have searched on...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My question involves business law in the state of: Nevada<br />
A friend of mine has a business that was sued in Nevada (apparently). I have searched on California's Pacer service and I have searched on <a href="https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Anonymous/default.aspx" target="_blank">Nevada's site</a> and still the case does not appear. <br />
The lawyer emailed my friend a copy of the complaint. It's been almost 2 months. I've searched by the lawyer's name, the Plaintiff's name, the defendant's company name, by case number. Nothing. Does it take this long for the people at the court house to enter this info???  Or do they wait until the defendant is served before posting online?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>MrMister</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158610</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Evidence: When Can You Have a Police Report Admitted as Evidence Under Rule 803(8)</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158590&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:32:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[My question involves court procedures for the state of: Illinois 
 
I understand that 803(8) has a few different interpretations, as I've come across...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My question involves court procedures for the state of: Illinois<br />
<br />
I understand that 803(8) has a few different interpretations, as I've come across a few different interpretations. However, I'm dealing with CIVIL court and the ILLINOIS rules of evidence rather than the federal rules of evidence in this situation.<br />
<br />
Can a police report be used in civil court between two domestic parties?<br />
<br />
Let me qualify it, for hearsay sake.<br />
<br />
<br />
1) Person 1 calls the police to report an alleged crime that Person A is alleged of committing<br />
2) Police officer shows up<br />
3) Person 1 tells the police officer what happened<br />
4) Person 2, another resident of the residence, tells the police officer her take on things from what she has observed of Person A<br />
5) The police officer generates a police report with what Person 1 and Person 2 had to say about Person A<br />
6) It becomes public record<br />
<br />
Can this police report be used in civil court as evidence rather than hearsay?<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			FRE 803(8) provides that records, reports, statements, or data compilation, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth (A) the activities of the office or agency, or (B) matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report, excluding, however, in criminal cases matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel, or <b>(C) in civil actions and proceedings and against the Government in criminal cases, factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law</b>, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div>source: <a href="http://www.proskauerguide.com/litigation/17/II/:pf_printable" target="_blank">http://www.proskauerguide.com/litiga.../:pf_printable</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			  (5) Structural Change: A hearsay exception in Illinois with respect to both business and public records is recognized in civil cases by Illinois Supreme Court Rule 236, excluding police accident reports, and in criminal cases by section 115 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (725 ILCS 5/115), excluding medical records and police investigative records. The Illinois Rules of Evidence in Rule 803(6), records of regularly conducted activity (i.e., business records), and in Rule 803(8), public records and reports, while retaining the exclusions described above, removes the difference between civil and criminal business and public records in favor of the traditional and otherwise uniformly accepted division between business records, Rule 803(6), and public records and reports, Rule 803(8), both applicable in civil and criminal cases.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div>source: <a href="http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/evidence/Evidence.htm" target="_blank">http://www.state.il.us/court/supreme...e/Evidence.htm</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			(8) Public records and reports. Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth (A) the activities of the office or agency, or (B) matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report, excluding, however, police accident reports and <b>in criminal cases</b> medical records and matters observed by police officers and other law enforcement personnel, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div>source: <a href="http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/evidence/Evidence.htm" target="_blank">http://www.state.il.us/court/supreme...e/Evidence.htm</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>untouchedworld</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158590</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Service of Process: Being Sued for 7 Year Old Debt , Never Served With a Summons</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158558&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:52:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>My question involves collection proceedings in the State of: CAL 
 
 
    Received a letter from a law firm today stating they want to help with a...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My question involves collection proceedings in the State of: CAL<br />
<br />
<br />
    Received a letter from a law firm today stating they want to help with a case. It stating that Portfolio Recovery Associates are suing me and this law firm would like to represent me. Its a legit case cause I entered the case number on the superior court website and it states this:<br />
<br />
    Case Number: xxxxxx<br />
    PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, VS. XXXXX<br />
    Court: Chatsworth Courthouse<br />
<br />
    Filing Date: 04/24/2013<br />
    Case Type: COLLECTIONS CASE (Limited Jurisdiction)<br />
    Status: PENDING<br />
    Future Hearings<br />
<br />
    04/22/2014 at 08:30 AM in department F43 at 9425 Penfield Ave., Chatsworth, CA 91311<br />
    OSC - 3.740 COLLECTIONS-DEFAULT JUDGMENT<br />
<br />
<br />
    Histories (Dates listed in descending order)<br />
<br />
    05/06/2013 CASE FILE FORWARDED TO RECORDS RE: FOR FILING<br />
<br />
    05/01/2013 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING SIGNED AND FILED<br />
    TO SHOW WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR<br />
    FAILURE TO FILE REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT<br />
    PURSUANT TO CRC 3.740(F). MATTER CONTINUED FOR HEARING<br />
    ON 04/22/14 AT 08:30A M., CERTIFICATE<br />
    OF MAILING FILED, GIVEN TO RESPECTIVE PARTIES/ COUNSEL.<br />
<br />
    04/24/2013 COLLECTIONS CASE COMPLAINT FILED PURSUANT TO<br />
<br />
    04/24/2013 SUMMONS ISSUED.<br />
<br />
    04/24/2013 SUMMONS FILED.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
    ^^^^^<br />
<br />
    I never received a summons.<br />
<br />
    I only have one bad mark on my credit and thats a unpaid hospital bill from Nevada when I was in Vegas and that was in June of 2006. I have not received a call or letter about this debt in over 3 years.. My phone number nor address has changed..<br />
<br />
<br />
    Since this debt is 7 years old, isn't the SOL issued here?<br />
<br />
    Can someone explain what happened and what I should do from here?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>mdh</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158558</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Filing a Complaint: Petition for Modification Dismissed Due to Failure to Serve the Other Party</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158419&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:19:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>My question involves court procedures for the state of: California    , County of Marin 
 
I filed a request for modification of child support (I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My question involves court procedures for the state of: California    , County of Marin<br />
<br />
I filed a request for modification of child support (I have two girls and a custody order from 2005 at me 47% of the time / $629/m) after the ex-wife turned me into the department of Child Support last year for falling behind 6 payments after she was re-married, doubled her income and we agreed to stop the payments.<br />
<br />
I did not serve either my ex-wife or the required copy to DPS and continued to make monthly extensions in the case date on court calendar from December to April 2013, because of lack of complete information from her and her husband and I wanted to get DPS off my back by making the 6 months of payments, thus removing the requirement for the case to be heard in a special DPS monitored court room w/ a commissioner. <br />
<br />
I worked with a department of child support supervisor in early January who told me that I could continue the case if the parties had not been served and it was still &quot;with me&quot;. <br />
<br />
The department of child support services pulled the case off the calendar April 28th without any notice. <br />
<br />
Was there a statute of limitations as to the case on calendar with multiple extensions or did DPS unlawfully act on this case? <br />
<br />
My loss is that now I will be responsible for payments backwards to December-April and Now May, instead of the California law stating that if a modification is granted, then it applies backdated to the date of filing for the modification.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>kcurtis</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158419</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Service of Process: Can a Party Be Served by a Process Server During a Lawsuit</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158310&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 00:38:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>My question relates to legal practice in the state of: Texas 
 
Currently, we are involved in a civil lawsuit over property.  The other party has...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My question relates to legal practice in the state of: Texas<br />
<br />
Currently, we are involved in a civil lawsuit over property.  The other party has tried to contact us, to which our lawyer has stated several times that they are not supposed to and that they need to direct themselves to her.<br />
<br />
Yesterday, one of the persons involved in a lawsuit was visited by a man claiming to be a Certified Process Server.  He handed her some papers in which the other party is suing her.  She told the man that she has an attorney and that the other party is aware of this and that she was advised by her attorney that they should not be trying to contact her.  The man claimed that the process was legal since neither party was allowed to contact each other, and neither were the lawyers able to contact each other, so that is what a Certified Process Server is for.  We haven't had a chance to talk to our lawyer and show her the papers given because it is the weekend, so I am curious to know if what the guy said was true?  Can the other party use a Certified Process Server to serve us knowing we already have a lawyer and a lawsuit is still pending over the same case in which they are trying to sue my relative again with?<br />
<br />
Any insight is greatly appreciated.  Thank you :)</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>iammetx</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158310</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Service of Process: First Name Only on Process Server Affidavit</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158220&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:23:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[My question involves medical malpractice in the state of: TN 
 
I haven't found a lawyer yet but needed to go ahead pro se for now. I had to send the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My question involves medical malpractice in the state of: TN<br />
<br />
I haven't found a lawyer yet but needed to go ahead pro se for now. I had to send the notice of intent to sue for medical malpractice in order to avoid risking expiration of the statute of limitations. (Sending the notice extends the statute of limitations by 120 days.)<br />
<br />
I hired a process server for the first batch yesterday. His used a fill-in-the-blank, standard, one page, affadavit form.<br />
<br />
The name of person he gave the notice to is listed as, &quot;Julie, receptionist.&quot; Later he describes her by filling in blanks for age (30), sex (F), race (white), and hair color (brown).<br />
<br />
I'm very uncomfortable with the vagueness. The statute (<a href="http://law.justia.com/codes/tennessee/2010/title-29/chapter-26/part-1/29-26-121/" target="_blank">http://law.justia.com/codes/tennesse...t-1/29-26-121/</a>) states that, &quot;Delivery must be established by an affidavit stating that the notice was personally delivered and the identity of the individual to whom the notice was delivered.&quot;<br />
<br />
To me, identity of the individual means full name at least. I asked him about it and he said no worries.<br />
<br />
I still have worries. Can this affidavit be challenged by virtue of only giving a first name? Or does a first name plus minimal description meet the requirements of &quot;the identity of the individual&quot;?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>parminides</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158220</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Civil Procedure Issues: Court Appointment of a Receiver</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158199&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 23:38:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>My question involves court procedures for the state of: missouri 
My lender motioned and received the same day an Emergency Ex Parte Appointment of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My question involves court procedures for the state of: missouri<br />
My lender motioned and received the same day an Emergency Ex Parte Appointment of Receivership despite the agreement the lender and i had made. I was told that the bank would not take action upon me as long as we were working together (another separate issue). My accusations of fraud did not receive a sufficient response and after they were notified in detail of why a response was insufficient they then simply ignored my issues and filed the motion. <br />
As we were supposed to be still working together I feel that not only were they completely out of line, but that they purposely and in bad faith omitted relevant facts in submitting the motion.  In other words if given all facts a reasonable judge would not have made the order. All conversations are documented through email. The motion has caused confusion, and a lack of trust of tenants towards my capabilities and ownership of my properties which in turn has caused me extreme stress, anger, and embarrassment. Is the lender out of line? Or am I just being irresponsible for not succumbing to a loan that is grossly polluted in misdeeds?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>justj</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158199</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Evidence: What Evidence Do You Have to Give to Your Expert</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157775&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have a question regarding attorney-client privilege, privileged materials and ethics.  My case involved an environmental hazardous habitable issue....</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have a question regarding attorney-client privilege, privileged materials and ethics.  My case involved an environmental hazardous habitable issue.  I had a test done on my apartment after I found evidence of growth that concerned me (Test 1).  I then hired a lawyer and his firm did their own test (Test 2).  Test 1 produced the scientific evidence necessary to promote my case.  Test 2 did not.  My lawyer was prepared to go forward but then became unable to continue.  I found a new lawyer.  My new lawyer agreed that Test 1 was more compelling and beneficial to my case but then informed me that he could not find an expert because when he presented Test 2 to the experts they could not support the weak outcome.  When I asked why he was using Test 2 he said it was unethical for him not to present it. My understanding, based upon my new lawyer's own comments, was that Test 2 is privileged material. Test 2 wasn't produced to the opposing council for that reason. If Test 2 is indeed privileged how could my new lawyer show it to potential experts?  How is it unethical and, if so, does that trump privilege?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>bg2101</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157775</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Civil Procedure Issues: TBD Refused for an Open Container Infraction in Fullerton County</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157702&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:29:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>My question involves court procedures for the state of: California 
 
Hello Everyone, 
 
My question is in regards to the procedure in which my case...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My question involves court procedures for the state of: California<br />
<br />
Hello Everyone,<br />
<br />
My question is in regards to the procedure in which my case is being dealt with.  I went through the motions to send in a Trial by Declaration to contest my ticket.  I used the material gained from <a href="http://www.helpigotaticket.com/tut/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.helpigotaticket.com/tut/index.html</a> as a template to facilitate this process, &amp; I was sent back this letter: <a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-lP4fHN6Ep8Y/UXhYVu38DEI/AAAAAAAAAG0/hOg3snlG1zE/s720/photo.JPG" target="_blank">https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-l...s720/photo.JPG</a><br />
<br />
I realize that at the bottom of the letter in <b>bold</b>, it clearly states that they <b>did not</b> receive my bail check.  This is true, as I forgot to include it when I sent it out the first time because I was in a rush.  <i>However</i>, I sent a second letter out <b>the day after</b> &amp; they <b>accepted &amp; charged</b> the bail check to my account.  <br />
<br />
This is the code the clerk cited, which in no way clarifies to me as to <b>why</b> she decided to refuse my request for TBD:<br />
<br />
<i> CAL. BPC. CODE § 25620 : California Code - Section 25620<br />
<br />
(a)Any person possessing any can, bottle, or other receptacle containing any alcoholic beverage that has been opened, or a seal broken, or the contents of which have been partially removed, in any city, county, or city and county owned park or other city, county, or city and county owned public place, or any recreation and park district, or any regional park or open-space district shall be guilty of an infraction if the city, county, or city and county has enacted an ordinance that prohibits the possession of those containers in those areas or the consumption of alcoholic beverages in those areas.<br />
<br />
(b)This section does not apply where the possession is within premises located in a park or other public place for which a license has been issued pursuant to this division.<br />
<br />
(c)This section does not apply when an individual is in possession of an alcoholic beverage container for the purpose of recycling or other related activity.</i><br />
<br />
Thus I am confused; this was the only letter sent to me.  They did not make an effort to send my papers for TBD &amp; I received this piece of mail but a mere week before the extension deadline they gave me.<br />
<br />
At this point, I have accepted the fact that I will most likely not be able to contest &amp; my $280.00 will have been wretched from my back pocket, but I would still like to couple some rhyme to this reasoning.  If any of this seems naive, my apologies as this is my first time contesting a ticket infraction, but I...oh my.  Is it because I am considered <i>guilty</i> by the county per section <b>25620(a)</b>, &amp; thus contesting with a TBD (where I am assumed &quot;not guilty&quot; until convicted) is not applicable?  I think I may have answered my own question, but a response to clarify, correct, or concur would be much appreciated ASAP. <br />
<br />
Thank You!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>Concerned Citizen</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157702</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Civil Procedure Issues: How to Expunge Civil Case Records</title>
			<link>http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157696&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>My question involves court procedures for the state of: Washington, King County Superior Court 
 
 
Back in December 2010, a civil case was filed...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My question involves court procedures for the state of: Washington, King County Superior Court<br />
<br />
<br />
Back in December 2010, a civil case was filed against me.  The complainant filed the paperwork ex-parte.  They never served me to appear, the case never was set for a hearing, and the case did not proceed.  It was dismissed by the court clerk.  Can I expunge these documents?  How do I do so?  <br />
<br />
Civil case expunge order form?<br />
Process?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=182">Civil Procedure</category>
			<dc:creator>mikeb12</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=157696</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
